• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:59:23 -0800
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEEADC@HQ5>

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> "An underclass already exists..."
> 
> So without any substantial benefit, we rig a standard
> to create a permanent underclass?
> 
> Ummm.... that's nuts.

Agreed. But since the underclass already exists, moving namespaces into
the XML 1.1 spec has no effect on this. (Similarly, leaving it out does
not make the underclass any less permanent.) The way to get rid of the
underclass is to get DTDs and namespaces to play together.

-- Ron

• References:
  • RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: Validate an XPath with regex
• Previous by thread: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread