• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: lots of WS reading material
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... ('John Cowan'), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B35F@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Apr 26, 2002 07:53:43 AM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> That would tend to suggest that for the XML on The 
> Web system, the Infoset specification is core and 
> that XML 1.0 is a syntax mapping corresponding to 
> a subset of SGML.

Why do people have to take this superior-inferior, I-win-you-lose
point of view?  Why can't the syntax and the infoset just be two
ways of looking at the blackbird?  Light is the left hand of darkness,
darkness the right hand of light.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: lots of WS reading material
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: lots of WS reading material
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• References:
  • RE: lots of WS reading material
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Visually display xml on the web?
• Next by Date: What is "the Web"
• Previous by thread: RE: lots of WS reading material
• Next by thread: Re: lots of WS reading material
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread