Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
In a message dated 23/04/02 22:34:57 GMT Daylight Time, paul@p... writes: And I thought I was strident: Paul, I don't see anything particularly "strident" in Roy Fielding's comments. Perhaps you meant that his conclusion was extreme? He was correcting a misapprehension expressed earlier that "W3C is, at heart, an academic organization." which is patently dubious. He correctly points out that W3C is a "pay-to-play consortium". I would disagree with his conclusion that ".... then the W3C should not exist." I think a much more constructive approach is to say that W3C should be improved. Not least important of such improvements is that W3C should be more open than it currently is. Andrew Watt
|
