• To: jeni@j...
• Subject: Re: which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 06:28:26 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo), paul_hermans@p... (Paul Hermans), xml-dev@l..., xmlschema-dev@w...
• In-reply-to: <1381473716952.20020419095548@j...> from "Jeni Tennison" at Apr 19, 2002 09:55:48 AM

Jeni Tennison scripsit:

> (basic XML 1.0 well-formedness
> parsing should give a warning if xml:lang isn't a language code, I
> think).

No, the production rules given for xml:lang values in the First Edition were
not actually linked to any other production rules, and were removed by
erratum, as shown in the Second Edition.  So <foo xml:lang="$@#$"/>
is in fact well-formed and valid, though semantically bad.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • Re: which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
• Next by Date: Re: Patents
• Previous by thread: Re: which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
• Next by thread: RE: which xml schema tools do it right concerning including attributes xml:lang and xml:space
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread