• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:45:06 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200204092008.g39K80s01648@d...>
• References: <20020409194616.GA31000@t...> <001801c1dfeb$ee03ce60$6501a8c0@pcukmka> <3CB32B8C.4F8D5BD8@s...><200204092008.g39K80s01648@d...>

At 1:08 PM -0700 4/9/02, Joe English wrote:


>I'm ambivalent about this.  QNames in content sound like a
>Really Bad Idea on the face of it, but on the other hand
>of all the RECs to come out of the W3C, XSLT is the only
>one in which namespace issues don't cause a tremendous
>headache to end users.

Actually there is one place where's there's a bunch of headache for 
end-users: matching the default namespace, and that's precisely 
because the default namespace doesn't apply in attribute values. Go 
figure.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|             http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)
  • RE: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread