• To: "'james.anderson@s...'" <james.anderson@s...>
• Subject: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:49:14 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

No, I'm not rejecting them in their entirety.  They 
are too useful.  I am saying they don't belong in the 
core given definitions that leave their 'resolvability' 
an unpredictable property.  That's it.  That's all.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: james anderson [mailto:james.anderson@s...]

is the goal, to avoid that with which namespaces are conflated, laudable
though it is, adequate reason to reject them in their entirety?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Previous by thread: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread