• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: XML compatibility with SGML (was Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1)
• From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
• Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 08:34:46 -0500
• References: <3CAB42D4.1030402@d...> <200204031820.TAA14729@m...> <20020403183305.GA16884@p...> <002201c1db41$a2e79e10$6400a8c0@seairthlaptop> <3CAB816E.9326EAAF@r...> <3CAB95F2.31C14211@a...> <3CAC0602.A85204F9@r...>
• Reply-to: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

One of the things I undersand to be true about XML-1.0 is that it is a
subset of SGML such that any SGML processor can understand and XML document
as-is.  If XML Nnamespaces-1.1 were to be joined to XML-1.1, what does this
mean about SGML compatibility?  Is this even a consideration for future
versions of XML?  Or is the issue of compatibility only concerned with
well-formedness? (sorry, I know little about SGML itself.)

---
Seairth Jacobs
seairth@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML compatibility with SGML (was Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1)
    • From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...>

• References:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: Namespaces in XML 1.1 Requirements
• Previous by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: XML compatibility with SGML (was Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread