• To: matthew.gertner@s... (Matthew Gertner)
• Subject: Re: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really ad
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:36:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: ann@w... ('Ann Navarro'), jcowan@r... (John Cowan), AndrewWatt2000@a..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <DC1124C4368AA9438D9DEC34ECB6F162013EBA1E@o...> from "Matthew Gertner" at Apr 22, 2002 05:02:26 PM

Matthew Gertner scripsit:

> I would have expected the
> W3C to take a more open stance and revise it if events prove this to be
> necessary (and I will give very attractive odds if someone wants to bet that
> this would be the case).

That is indeed (or so I believe) in progress, but the W3C is unwilling
to impose openness, *especially* retroactively, on its WGs.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really ad
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • RE: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really add?)
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really add?)
• Next by Date: Re: What does SOAP really add?
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really ad d?)
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really ad
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread