• To: james.anderson@s...
• Subject: Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 08:35:22 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3CB53C00.8CC05AB@s...> (message from james anderson on Thu,11 Apr 2002 09:33:46 +0200)
• References: <200204101608.RAA03613@m...> <3CB53C00.8CC05AB@s...>

> By this I do not mean that one cannot figure out how to make it mostly
> work, I mean that one cannot guarantee that it will always work.

The behaviour is fully specified by the XSLT recommendation and as far
as I have seen reliably implemented in all the XSLT implementations.
In what way can you not guarantee that anything will work?

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• Next by Date: RE: XHTML survival rate?
• Previous by thread: Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Naive Question about NS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread