• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Culture and Aims )
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:33:42 -0400
• In-reply-to: <NJCBAFE82YX3W612ZQOUPNI1RNSNNI.3cc95514@MChamp>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020426083810.06a226e8@p...>

At 09:24 AM 4/26/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>Of course, we really should just shut up, get back to work, and revisit 
>this question in four years <grin>

That might be more productive.

After all, if people are concerned that XML Schema is verbose (and it is), 
they should be aware that the verbosity of schemas is two orders of 
magnitude less than the verbosity of emails on XML-Dev complaining about 
the verbosity of schemas.

Jonathan

• References:
  • Re: Fwd: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Culture and Aims )
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Fwd: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Culture andAims )
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Culture and Aims )
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Culture and Aims )
• Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Culture andAims )
• Next by thread: Re: Fwd: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Cultureand Aims )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread