[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Tim Bray wrote: > Interesting bet; I'll take it. All we need is a document-embeddable, > idempotency-assumable form blessed officially and we're off to the > races. I was assuming that we wouldn't have such a thing, but if we have and you win because it's solved the problem I'll probably be handing out cigars as well as booze! > I'm after the low-hanging fruit. If the GET mapping turns > out to be popular, maybe somebody real smart will figure out a good > way to to encode your blocks in a URL. And I'll be laughing all the way to the wine shop :) Francis.
|

Cart



