[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Tim Bray wrote:

> Interesting bet; I'll take it.  All we need is a document-embeddable,
> idempotency-assumable form blessed officially and we're off to the
> races.

I was assuming that we wouldn't have such a thing, but if we have and 
you win because it's solved the problem I'll probably be handing out 
cigars as well as booze!

> I'm after the low-hanging fruit.  If the GET mapping turns
> out to be popular, maybe somebody real smart will figure out a good
> way to to encode your blocks in a URL. 

And I'll be laughing all the way to the wine shop :)

Francis.



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member