[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Ooops, looks like a part of my post went away!

Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Joe English wrote:
> 

> What about declaring those documents?
> 
> <?sanity type="normal|sane|neurotic|psychotic"?>
> 
> with a default value of psychotic (unfortunately, but you can't assume 
> documents to be normal nor even sane) would allow consumers to adapt 
> their behavior or even to reject documents they don't like...
> 
> An adaptation of Evan's transformation could easily add this PI to 
> existing documents... a "lite XML" or "XML light").

Need to read here:

All this makes me thing that we should resurect Common XML (or create a 
"lite XML" or "XML light").

> 
> There are lots of additions to do with new specs such as W3C XML Schema, 
> XPointer or XPath 2.0 and an increasing need too!
> 
> Thanks for this delicious food for thoughts!
> 
> Eric

Sorry,

Eric
-- 
See you in Barcelona.
                               http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/schedule.asp
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member