• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: A new approach to XML Validation
• From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 09:53:43 -0500
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020401064623.00abd1d8@m...>
• Reply-to: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

I think it should be called the "McGrath Scale".  The higher the number, the
more devestating document...

---
Seairth Jacobs
seairth@s...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean McGrath" <sean.mcgrath@p...>
To: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:58 AM
Subject:  [OFFLIST] A new approach to XML Validation


> The current algorithms are designed to generate a single
> number [0..<10]. I've generated a bunch of these from
> the above XML documents. The number 1.618
> has occured a number of times on documents
> that I would consider "programmer friendly" and the
> number 4.669 on documents that are dogs to
> write software for.
>
> I need to chase down the significance (if any) of these
> numbers. It could be a problem in the XSLT extension
> functions.

• References:
  • [OFFLIST] A new approach to XML Validation
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: [OFFLIST] A new approach to XML Validation
• Next by Date: RE: Zero padding numbers in text output from a source XML document
• Previous by thread: [OFFLIST] A new approach to XML Validation
• Next by thread: Re: [OFFLIST] A new approach to XML Validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread