• To: "'W. E. Perry'" <wperry@f...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: lots of WS reading material
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:58:46 -0500

Not necessarily.  A superior position may develop, 
or a control may emerge from the engagement of 
multiple forces which directs their transactions. 
Therefore, in a given transaction, a rule may 
dominate based on the transaction type.  
In one philosophy, that is the role 
of Dharma.  It is not superior, but it becomes 
a means to choose the choice of choices.  The 
problem of a cleint/server model is to make 
a topology primary when in effect, as Shirkey 
notes, one only really needs to know who is requesting 
what from whom, so peer to peer emerges.

I think the outcome of that is that either 
syntax or the infoSet can be the means of 
correction, but working out rules for that 
is up to the programmer.  XML Doesn't Care.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: W. E. Perry [mailto:wperry@f...]

We cannot grant primacy to both light and darkness because one must have the
superior position to correct the other. 

• Prev by Date: RE: What are Web Services for? (Was RE: lots of WS reading material)
• Next by Date: RE: Fwd: Re: W3C Successes (RE: W3C Culture and Aims )
• Previous by thread: Re: lots of WS reading material
• Next by thread: RE: lots of WS reading material
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread