• To: "'james.anderson@s...'" <james.anderson@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:31:18 -0500

Normative doesn't mean anything in a discussion in 
which the resolvability has been left to whim.  The 
spec leaks.

Namespaces don't belong in the core.  As an ancillary 
rec, they have all the clout they need to work in 
the system.  No change is needed at this time.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: james anderson [mailto:james.anderson@s...]

i rephrase my question.

the normative aspects of namespaces have to do with name identity.
the normative aspects of namespaces have nothing to do with resolution.
how do reasons which justify excluding resolution issues from the core
come to exclude normative aspects of namespaces from the core?

• Prev by Date: RE: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread