• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 13:37:50 -0700
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEEAFB@HQ5>

At 08:14 AM 08/04/02 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>I'm not reading intent. I see trends.  Tim Bray et al's skunk document 
>makes it clear enough that some see removing DTDs as the best 
>way to put namespaces in the core.  

Wrong.  I think that the following are good ideas:

1. removing schema languges from the base document syntax
2. putting namespaces in the core.

The two are orthogonal. -Tim

• References:
  • RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UDDI, RDF, semweb?
• Next by Date: XML in C
• Previous by thread: Re: ?porting DTD namespace support to java [Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread