• To: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:29:39 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3C7DADFF.3D1369FA@p...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <NCBBKFMJCLIMOBIGKFMJOEANHEAA.ldodds@i...> <E16g2J3-0005yn-00@c...> <3C7DADFF.3D1369FA@p...>

On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:11 pm, Paul Prescod wrote:
> class Resource{
>   Representation GET()
>   void PUT(Representation)
>   Representation POST(Representation)
>   void DELETE()
> }

Hmmm. HTTP isn't *really* necessary here is it? HTTP is both a 
vocabulary and an on-the-wire syntax.

• References:
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REST as RPC done right
• Next by Date: RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MSthinks HTTP Needs Replacing???)
• Previous by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by thread: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread