• To: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Subject: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 28 Feb 2002 09:56:54 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3C7DAE91.A01381CC@p...>
• References: <001701c1bf9f$e27e0720$887ba8c0@mitchum><1014827341.2372.60.camel@l...> <3C7DAE91.A01381CC@p...>

On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 23:14, Paul Prescod wrote:
> There is a difference between saying that HTTP is related to RPC and
> saying that HTTP is an RPC protocol like XML-RPC or SOAP-RPC.

Sure.  But I'd like to see HTTP/REST folks acknowledge their own
relationship to RPC before blasting on "RPC protocols".

For those of us who find HTTP/REST to be too much RPC, it's awfully hard
to argue with flat (and I believe wrong) denials that REST is still
substantially built on RPC, as is HTTP.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
  • RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
• Next by Date: RE: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
• Previous by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread