• To: "'jborden@a...'" <jborden@a...>
• Subject: RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:31:27 -0600
• Cc: 'Joe English' <jenglish@f...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>

Or maybe less flexibly but just as indirectly, 
the actual local component.  So in a sense, 
that gives us notations back.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: jborden@a... [mailto:jborden@a...]

RDDL and XML Catalogs can work well together.

> Good to know.  And yes, I know that.
> 
> o  Catalog used to map the PUBLIC ID to the SYSTEM ID. Yes?
> 
> o  RDDL used to map the namespace id to some set of resources 
>    identified by purpose, type, etc.

RDDL _describes_ a namespace via text and a collection of resources

The way one gets a RDDL document from a namespace URI depends on the URI resolution process.

For example:

<foo xmlns="urn:publicid:-//FOO//Bar Version 1.0//EN">

</foo>

Software might use this URN based namespace 
to find the location of the RDDL document in the supplied
XML Catalog.

Jonathan

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Next by Date: Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Next by thread: RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread