• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• From: "Zach Kenyon" <zkenyon@s...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:52:01 -0600
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05573B4F@r...>
• Priority: normal
• Reply-to: zkenyon@s...
• Return-receipt-to: zkenyon@s...

On 20 Feb 2002, at 13:04, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> What I'd like to know is WHY he is against SOAP. In the old days I could
> understand why people didn't want various RPC services exposed on their
> machines because they were a security risk due to all the buffer
> overflows and the like that existed in them. 

Right, and we've now managed to eliminate all problems with buffer overflows 
with today's modern software.  Nobody ever uses sprintf anymore.


--
Zach Kenyon
Web Developer
zkenyon@s...
http://resumes.dice.com/zantispam
214.327.0250
----------------------------------------------------
Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today
Only $9.95 per month!
http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97

• References:
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Next by Date: RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Previous by thread: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Next by thread: Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread