• To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@m...>
• Subject: RE: REST has too many verbs
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 12 Feb 2002 19:20:30 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A54001@r...>
• References: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A54001@r...>

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 17:54, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> 
> >Sure - that's great design IF you want to send to send 
> >multiple pieces of various types.  I was merely saying that I 
> >don't want to send multiple pieces of various types, and 
> >therefore don't need or want those facilities.
> 
> Well, I think it might be useful even if you have only one piece -
> something like size and type still seems to apply.

If I have only one piece in one type, size is all that matters. 
Signaling the end of a document isn't especially difficult.  I don't
need or want the rest, as stated previously.  It's NOT useful in this
case.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: REST has too many verbs
    • From: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Principle of Sustainable Complexity
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Previous by thread: RE: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: RE: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread