• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 19:18:36 -0500
• References: <F122FbPmdzpe8KKUFme000179a1@h...><005101c1bfcf$6f20a370$51265fa6@carlsb1gjohns><001201c1c05f$5586d390$0bf13044@tbp>

[Thomas B. Passin]

> [Jason Diamond]
> To: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>; <xml-dev@l...>
> > > Question:
> > >
> > > Is the below document "conforming" with regard to the XML-Namespaces
> rec?
> > >
> > > <root xmlns:a="" />
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#dt-prefix
> >
>  Ironically, the paragraph Jason points to covers __non__-default
> namespaces, while the following paragraph, which does cover default
> namespaces, specifically says that an "empty" value is acceptable.  So the
> answer to the question is "yes" after all.
>

Talk about misreading! I read it as <root xmlns=""/> even though it clearly
didn't say that.  Sorry for the confusion.

Clearly the "not allowed" answer is what the Rec says.

Tom P

• References:
  • Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
    • From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
  • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
    • From: "Jason Diamond" <jason@i...>
  • Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: XML Standards Library 1.0 : Updated 1 March 2002
• Next by Date: Re: xml/XSL and javascript form issue
• Previous by thread: RE: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
• Next by thread: Re: Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread