[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: gtn@r... (Gavin Thomas Nicol)
  • Subject: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
  • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:40:03 -0500 (EST)
  • Cc: xml-dev@l...
  • In-reply-to: <E16b19Y-00075R-00@s...> from "Gavin Thomas Nicol" at Feb 13, 2002 09:55:59 AM

> Which is perfectly fine... the question though is how do I refer to a 
> *specific* digtal resource reliably, such that I can always retrieve a 
> represenation that it is a copy of the original resource? Using a URI, 
> how can I reliably point to foo.gif?

Use the URI provided in the Content-Location header of the response,
if any.

From RFC 2616, Sec 14.14;

  "A server SHOULD provide a Content-Location for the
   variant corresponding to the response entity; especially in the case
   where a resource has multiple entities associated with it, and those
   entities actually have separate locations by which they might be
   individually accessed, the server SHOULD provide a Content-Location
   for the particular variant which is returned."

If a specific URI for the representation isn't provided, then your
only choice is for you to identify it yourself by hanging that content
off of your own web server.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@p...
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member