• To: The Deviants <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 13:58:48 +0100
• Cc: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• Organization: nil
• References: <6D54B6A5DCF9D311971600D0B74758C101441B66@a...> <098701c1aa69$4d4d3cc0$0a2e249b@n...> <010801c1aa7d$f828ec70$4bc8a8c0@A...> <022301c1ab13$e92aa920$0301a8c0@n...>
• Reply-to: james.anderson@s...

...

The validation algorithm does not change.

So long as the parser performs interns "correctly",

 (see http://www.cl-xml.org/code/xquerydatamodel/xqdm-qnames.lisp)

the name identity comparison, upon which validation depends, does not
change at all.

 (see http://www.cl-xml.org/code/xquerydatamodel/xqdm-validation.lisp)

...

Jonathan Borden wrote:
> 
> Rick,
> 
> Wow. it is that easy. So what is the excuse for not doing this?
> 
> ...
> 
> Actually, it does not even need any change in DTD syntax AFAIK.
> It just needs a change in the way that validation is performed using DTDs.
>

• References:
  • Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• Next by thread: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread