• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST as RPC done right
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:23:17 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1014828130.2260.68.camel@l...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <1014828130.2260.68.camel@l...>

On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:42 am, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> Is it fair to describe REST as RPC done right?

Not really. More like REST is RPC *used* right. 

One of the points I've been trying to make is that "right" is 
subjective. The other being that REST != HTTP.

> From my perspective (XMLChucker etc.)

Speaking of which, I threw an implementation together of a thing I 
call XOAS (XML On A Socket). It basically allows you to throw XML, and 
(optionally) get some XML back.

If anyone is interested, I'll throw it up on the web somewhere.

• References:
  • REST as RPC done right
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Check out the pipeline submission
• Next by Date: Re: REST as RPC done right
• Previous by thread: RE: REST as RPC done right
• Next by thread: RE: REST as RPC done right
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread