• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:16:40 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200202271721.MAA28288@m...>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@a...]
>
> The rub there is, what is beyond hypertext?  If hypertext
> was/is envisioned to be able to capture all information, 
> what's left over to worry about?

Don't worry, there's always something else to worry about,
especially when you think there isn't  :)

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPH0wlOaWiFwg2CH4EQIc8gCfVPO8yKEbCFSA/RL4HzzXzIskMf0AoI3y
n5C7QdDYJ9KP2GXszFr8RuSd
=pNIk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by Date: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Previous by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread