• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Traditional RPC
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:21:42 -0800
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8C0@HQ5>

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> 
> The popularity wasn't based on the protocol.  

It's just a theory. 

1. My theory is that protocols will get chosen because they work
properly.

2. Your theory is that they will get chosen because they ship with MSDN
and other vendor-backed distributions.

3. Dave's seems to be that they will get chosen because they are popular
with end-users and surrounded by hype and excitement.

Obviously I subscribe to my theory.

 Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Traditional RPC
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
  • Re: Traditional RPC
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Traditional RPC
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Next by Date: Re: Traditional RPC
• Previous by thread: RE: Traditional RPC
• Next by thread: Re: Traditional RPC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread