• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Architectural Forms, A Summary
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:45:10 +1100
• References: <NCBBKFMJCLIMOBIGKFMJCEBGHDAA.ldodds@i...> <m3it91m6ep.fsf@d...>

Perhaps Steven could mention what the difference between an "architecture" and
an "architectural form" is. 

And Leigh's article could say:
   XHTML is an architecture
   XLink is an architecture
   RDDL is another architecture (using XHTML and XLink both in particular ways)

If that is so...

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Architectural Forms, A Summary
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@c...>

• References:
  • Architectural Forms, A Summary
    • From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: Architectural Forms, A Summary
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract" URIs
• Next by Date: OT: Re: OT: Arguments (was: a number of other threads)
• Previous by thread: Re: Architectural Forms, A Summary
• Next by thread: Re: Architectural Forms, A Summary
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread