[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Tim Bray wrote: > Actually, you've put your finger on it. I think we could lose > general entities tomorrow without much weeping. The piece that > hurts is named characters. The remedy is probably (in XML 2.0) to have xml:char and xml:charref attributes, for defining entities and referring to files of entity definitions. The value of xml:char could be something like "name hex name hex ..." where hex is a 1-5 digit Unicode code point. xml:charref would be a URI, obviously. -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
|

Cart



