• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:56:33 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8E7@HQ5>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8E7@HQ5>

On Wednesday 20 February 2002 05:17 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>  My guess is that a
> goodly sized db (say, 4000+ fields and use of
> remote views) would present a challenge to the
> designer of the business rules. 

The trick here is to use inheritance/grouping of permissions, and 
means for matching multiple resources with a single rule. We do this 
with a thing I call "split capabilities" defined in CML (Capability 
Markup Language... with apologies to the *other* CML ;-)).

Once you have a good understanding of the underlying principals, and 
the higher-level requirements, designing something like this is pretty 
trivial.

• References:
  • RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Next by Date: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Previous by thread: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Next by thread: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread