Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ronald Bourret wrote: > I also think that the real thrust of Patrick's argument echoes that of > the recent debate on RDDL. RDDL is a nice way to find information about > a given namespace, but it is insufficient for document processing in the > general case given the wide variation in namespace semantics that Tim > points out in item (2). That is, it may be possible to process a > document based solely on the information in various RDDL documents, but > this is unlikely to be true in general. I haven't made up my mind whether RDDL is a good enough idea to be worth investing more time in either by way of development or standardization; at least it's been a useful thought experiment. That being said, could you outline some scenarios where RDDL would fail be sufficient for reasons of insufficient generality or whatever? -Tim
|
