• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:48:23 -0500
• In-reply-to: <001e01c1b3b7$183443b0$887ba8c0@mitchum>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <001e01c1b3b7$183443b0$887ba8c0@mitchum>

On Tuesday 12 February 2002 06:18 am, Bill de hÓra wrote:
> The data structure underpinning a HTTP message is a roughly a list
> of key value pairs. The data structure underlying XML is a roughly a
> tree. As I see it these data structures are appropriate for the
> respective tasks at hand. What is more solid about trees than maps
> in the HTTP case?

I think the hey,value pairs have shown themsevles to be insufficient. 
Look at MIME media types for a prime example, or the Accept-* headers. 
Many headers have a built-in ad-hoc syntax for representing structure.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• References:
  • RE: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Why REST? (RE: WSIO- With Name)
• Next by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Previous by thread: RE: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: RE: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread