• To: "'Roger L. Costello'" <costello@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:47:11 -0600

That I can agree with.  Action-expected is just another chunk-o-data 
used to test ontological commitment.   It doesn't require a wedding, 
but picking up the check for dinner is nice.  That is probably the 
ultimate expression of loose coupling.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger L. Costello [mailto:costello@m...]

After some reflection I agree that an XML message must contain, along
with the data, an indication of how the sender wants the data acted
upon.  What I do not agree with is that the data and the
action-indication must be inextricably married.

• Prev by Date: Re: A heavier-weight proposal for character entitydefinition
• Next by Date: Re: Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessingnamespaces)
• Previous by thread: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented
• Next by thread: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread