• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:50:22 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3C7DADFF.3D1369FA@p...>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] 
>
> If the interface to HTTP is basically
> 
> class Resource{
>   Representation GET()
>   void PUT(Representation)
>   Representation POST(Representation)
>   void DELETE()
> }

Shouldn't that be: 

struct Resource{
  Representation GET(uri)
  void PUT(Representation, uri)
  Representation POST(Representation, uri)
  void DELETE(uri)
}

?

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPH38MuaWiFwg2CH4EQI1owCgwrEgRKtB2NQfuvQ5+phKfhQj4zEAoMYQ
L00BXdCeeleq0cY0U68q61Zn
=k3LQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Simple xpath software request
• Next by Date: RE: HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???)
• Previous by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Next by thread: Re: MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread