• To: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>, "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>
• Subject: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:25:57 -0800
• Cc: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@a...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>

Arggh!! I left off the footnotes from my message.

> From: Michael Brennan 

<snip/>

> Oh really? So when I send a PDF document over HTTP, does that 
> mean PDF is just an extension of HTTP? Some of the arguments 
> that get advanced, here, really baffle me. Just look at 
> SAML[1], or DSML[2]. These provide SOAP bindings of their 
> structures, but also allow bindings to other "protocols" 
> (and, yes, dammit! I am using the word "protocol", here). How 
> would you argue, then, that SAML or DSML are just SOAP extensions?

These were meant to reference:
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dsml/

Sorry.

• Prev by Date: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented
• Next by Date: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented
• Previous by thread: Re: Number of methods.
• Next by thread: RE: Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread