• To: XMLDEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents"
• From: Jandia Cyril <cjandia@l...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:04:45 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <NOEAIMPIDHNAGMHPJJKHKEHKCCAA.cjandia@l...>

Maybe (ahem... yet another... fool I am...) "via" URI scheme ?

Say :

<< via://[optional date-info][:ns-document-URI-scheme, defaulting to
http]@rddl.org/rddl2/ >>

then, either of

<< via://[date-info]@rddl.org/rddl2/ >>
or
<< via://[date-info]:http@r.../rddl2/ >>

could easily be bound to :

<< http://rddl.org/rddl2/[date-info] >>

(where [date-info] is, at the level of the user-agent processing "via:"
URIs, restricted to be ISO date variants)

[uri-schemes] "URIs are noun phrases, not verb phrases"
  http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes.html

PS :
"Via" (the latin word - see [uri-schemes]) meaning sth like :
"the road to get to... the identified namespace in space (rddl.org) and time
(date-info)" ;o)

Rgds,
--CJ

• References:
  • RE: 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents"
    • From: Jandia Cyril <cjandia@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Simplified XPointer
• Next by Date: Re: Simplified XPointer
• Previous by thread: RE: 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents"
• Next by thread: RE: Tower of Babbage
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread