• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDDL: minor update
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:59:14 -0800
• In-reply-to: <20020220220325.TRBX1147.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@rwcrwbc55>

At 10:03 PM 20/02/02 +0000, jborden@a... wrote:
>I've placed a minor and interim update to the RDDL spec 
>at http://www.rddl.org/ -- it contains fixes to some 
>errata, some rewording, and inclusion of a RELAXNG 1.0 
>schema for RDDL.

Should add a word of explanation: the rewording is basically
a rewrite of the first two paragraphs of the document, which
asserted that a namespace was a "class of resources" (?) and
implied that the RDDL directory was of links from the namespace
to the related resources.   Michael Sperberg-McQueen pointed
out that the links were actually from the descriptions of
the related resources to the resources... claiming you're
linking to a namespace is a highly philosophically risky
proposition.

Oh, and fixed a few inconsistencies in the use of terms and
got the resource/entity/URI nomenclature right per the RFCs -Tim

• References:
  • RDDL: minor update
    • From: jborden@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Next by Date: Re: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Previous by thread: RDDL: minor update
• Next by thread: Architecture Description Markup Language
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread