• To: 'Paul Prescod' <paul@p...>
• Subject: RE: Traditional RPC
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:11:44 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

I don't believe in 

"The ultimate goal of Web services, many vendors say, is to let Internet
applications interact with each other the same way humans interact with
them."

That doesn't work.  I believe humans configure these systems to work 
and keep up with what they do.  Again, pay attention to what I am 
saying about not going too deep with this.  Fine-grained processing 
will become hazardous to the health of the business at light speed.

After that, again as I said to Dave, it appears the vendor gets 
to choose between RPC and UDDI/HTTP in the toolkits.  Many of us 
who build applications get to choose among the toolkits.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...]

My sense is that we are miles away from "working good enough" 
if the problem domain is as described here:

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Traditional RPC
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was:Re:"Abstract"URIs
• Next by Date: RE: Traditional RPC
• Previous by thread: RE: Traditional RPC
• Next by thread: Re: Traditional RPC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread