• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 13 Feb 2002 10:49:04 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE867@HQ5>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE867@HQ5>

On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 09:37, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>  Yet, if the 
> W3C is to serve its membership, it must listen 
> and respond if these members make a case that 
> the Semantic Web is not where they want their 
> dollars to be spent.

And for those of us more interested in the Web than in the members, it
may not be such a bad thing to see the hype-meisters of Web Services
take their toys and go someplace else.

They might conceivably do less damage to XML and the Web that way, in
any case.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>

• References:
  • RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Next by Date: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Previous by thread: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Next by thread: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread