• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 11 Feb 2002 17:59:06 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200202112151.QAA09003@m...>
• References: <200202112151.QAA09003@m...>

On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 16:51, Mark Baker wrote:
> getFile(), getName(), getArticle(), getStockQuote() were what we had
> *before* the Web.  I can't see any reason to go back after seeing
> what can be achieved with GET.

If reducing the number of function names in favor of fewer function
names with more flexible arguments seems like progress to you, I suppose
that's an improvement.

Exchanging information outside of a function framework seems to me like
a more likely field for continuing improvement.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• References:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Previous by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread