• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Traditional RPC
• From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:25:02 -0800
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8BD@HQ5>

>if I were faced with two different offerings for web
> services, one based on RPC-style transactions and one
> based on the web architecture

Just use whatever suits your mood.

Look at it this way -- if the court hadn't killed Napster, I have no doubt
we'd be using their protocol to do web services, not SOAP or XML-RPC.

Think about that!

Dave

• References:
  • RE: Traditional RPC
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Why REST was Re: URIs are simply names
• Next by Date: RE: Traditional RPC
• Previous by thread: RE: Traditional RPC
• Next by thread: RE: Traditional RPC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread