Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Leigh Dodds wrote: >Interesting. Looks to like XSLT-- or AFs++. I think this >is worth pursuing further. > The XSLT-like syntax is an intention; since everybody knows XSLT, people would be able to use the most of features in an intuitive way. However, there are some fundamental incompabilities with XSLT such as SAX-oriented axes. I will try to create a bit more consistent definition of the streaming language soon I and would be very glad to discuss it with those who may be interested. Regards, Petr > > >Lately, I've realised that while we've got a nice collection of >schema languages, there's not a great deal to choose from in >other areas (except tree models perhaps). So exploring other >kinds of transformation mechanisms seems like a good thing >to me. > >I can see this being particularly useful when written as >a Cocoon Transformer. > >L. > -- Petr Cimprich Ginger Alliance www.gingerall.com
|
