• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 12 Feb 2002 09:52:06 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200202120512.AAA13850@m...>
• References: <200202120512.AAA13850@m...>

On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 00:12, Mark Baker wrote: 
> Take it from a protocol weenie, you're in a for a big surprise.  If
> you've got no a priori agreement about the task at hand, you're not
> going to accomplish much.

We have one a priori agreement - XML syntax (and even that I have doubts
about).  The rest I don't find particularly agreeable or necessary, but
I've been over that before on this list.

I'll let you all know when I get systems running that can cope with this
approach and do useful work.  It won't be tomorrow - I've got a day job
- but I will get there, promise.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Next by Date: SGML Parsers
• Previous by thread: A priori agreement
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread