• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Documents within documents
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 04:57:17 -0500
• References: <000d01c1afd0$d2f8e5b0$78fe0250@pcukmka>

Michael Kay wrote:
> 
>...
> 
> The usual excuse for doing it seems to be that the inner document has a
> <!DOCTYPE..> declaration that people want to preserve while carrying an XML
> document over some protocol like SOAP.
> 
> Is there a better solution that we can point them to?

I would suggest that the two documents be related through some kind of
hyperlink and textually combined with MIME. If you treat the inner
document as you would a bitmap or PDF then you don't have to "special
case" XML and DOCTYPEs. The inner document may have its own encoding and
its validation can be done from the top-down using standard techniques
instead of tricky, magical, runtime schema combination.

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • Documents within documents
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Designing Problems.
• Next by Date: Re: Doctypes again (was Re: Documents within documents)
• Previous by thread: Documents within documents
• Next by thread: XML to UML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread