• To: "'Jandia Cyril'" <cjandia@l...>, XMLDEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents"
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:04:36 -0800

> From: Jandia Cyril [mailto:cjandia@l...]

<snip/>

> So I am talking about kind of "self-describing URIs" when 
> they are serving
> the purpose of namespace identification and whether there exists an
> *explicitly* coupled (or not) namespace document.

I'm not sure I fully understand your posts, but this one seems to me like it
should be easy. URI schemes should mean something; those schemes have been
key to the web's success. When you see "http:", that should tell you that
it's a locator pointing to a resource that can be retrieved via HTTP. If
that's used as a namespace name, then it should point to a namespace
document.

Those who don't want to have a namespace document at the end of the URI
should simply use an appropriate scheme that does not imply that it points
to a resource.

• Prev by Date: RE: Worse XML tools?
• Next by Date: RE: Two sides of SOAP (was RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security)
• Previous by thread: RE: 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents"
• Next by thread: Restriction of MIXED
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread