• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:30:07 -0800
• References: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C10436FA5D@r...>

Joshua Allen wrote:
> 
>...
> 
> That's where I definitely disagree -- Web Services is just *one*
> application of XML, and was not the first, neither will it be the last.
> Many of the things W3C is working on (besides WS stuff like SOAP)
> address other uses of XML.  I think that web services are hitting
> deployment faster simply because the concept of "Execute some code over
> there" is more straightforward and understandable by people. 

Is that what web services are about? We have a serious terminological
difference. I thought it was about organizations integrating their
information systems. I'm not trying to be glib. I'm seriously trying to
work out what web services are. SOAP is indeed a sufficient protocol for
saying "execute some code over there." But it is probably the seventh or
eight sufficient protocol in that vein...

 Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract"URIs
• Next by Date: Using XML for data transfer between B2B applications
• Previous by thread: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
• Next by thread: RE: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread