Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From: "Bill Lindsey" <bill@b...> > USEMAP anybody? For those who don't get this, Bill is refering to SGML's Short References, which appear to provide exactly the thing that the article at IBM mentions. It seems that the same set of requirements that people had 15 years ago when SGML was standardized has not suddenly changed: tagging data with as few keystrokes as possible, with good visual clues, and being able to think about the text more as a linear flow rather than as nested elements. Simon's Regular Fragmentations seems to provide a nice reworking of Short References with the XML zeitgeist: no entities and synchronous with the containing element. (This probably makes Regular Fragmantations only suitable for inline short-cuts, such as date fields and case citations, so it is not as general as Short References which also would handle paragraph breaks, lists starting with "*", etc., better, I suspect) > I don't expect the casual user to ever become comfortable > with angle brackets, But is XML used by "casual users"? Or is XML more like programming languages, where there is arguably no such thing as a "casual programmer" (i.e., someone who starts programming without any specific knowledge of what they are doing) in the way that there is a casual user of a bus (who only needs the skill of sitting down). A casual user is not using XML: an suitable application for them is not "hiding" the angle brackets per se, but giving them domain-specific UI objects for more direct manipulation. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
