• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: New Patent Policy Draft
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 26 Feb 2002 10:55:16 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE92B@HQ5>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE92B@HQ5>

On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 09:39, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Any lawyers out there able to decipher this document?   
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/patent-policy

I've given it a rough shot at:
http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1558

It seems to me like Royalty-Free is very strongly preferred, but they're
keeping their options open if absolutely necessary.  The "Exception
Handling" part is especially interesting.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • New Patent Policy Draft
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis
• Next by Date: RE: Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis
• Previous by thread: New Patent Policy Draft
• Next by thread: Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread