• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: REST has too many verbs
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:09:29 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1013451210.845.127.camel@l...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <1013451210.845.127.camel@l...>

On Monday 11 February 2002 01:13 pm, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> After spending a few hours catching up on the REST discussion here
> and the discussions which led to it, I'm starting to wonder if
> REST's adoration of HTTP raises problems itself.

This is almost exactly what I said to Paul and Mark earlier. Roy's 
thesis even points out some of the issues with HTTP vis-a-vis REST... 
to the point that experimentation with things other than HTTP seems 
sensible.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REST has too many verbs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • REST has too many verbs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: REST has too many verbs
• Next by Date: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Previous by thread: REST has too many verbs
• Next by thread: Re: REST has too many verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread