• To: 'Jonathan Borden' <jborden@a...>, 'Joshua Allen' <joshuaa@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:43:24 -0600

The point is, I'm hoping as suggested that they are working out 
the wrinkles.  The web service support is already  
in the shipping code.  It would be nice if it 
worked for any customer regardless of which 
platform they develop on.  Unless they do profile 
and test rigorously, it ain't likely.

I don't doubt MS will do something with the 
SW.  They mention it in speeches.  The W3C will 
rename it eventually and with the blessing 
of their members.  Remember SGML On The Web?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@a...]

> The question now is whether or not the base
> web service specs as they stand today and
> the code on the docks is ready for us to
> work with and get something happening.

What is the point then? Just do it. Who needs this "WS-I" acronym? Less hype
and more code is always a good thing.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
• Next by Date: schema & polymorphism - resolving duplicate element definitions
• Previous by thread: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
• Next by thread: Re: WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread